Insight /

Why do We Hate HR?

Share on linkedin
Share on twitter
Share on facebook
Why do We Hate HR?

The quality of the human resources (HR) department can significantly affect a business’s prosperity. Its responsibility is to handle employee matters, making it an invaluable part of any company. As such, it should be the epitome of quality and professionalism. 

Instead, HR holds a negative reputation. 

A survey by BambooHR shows a significant disparity in how executives and employees perceive the human resources department. 

Namely, 87% of executives feel comfortable approaching HR with a personal or a work-related problem, and 84% believe they offer excellent support, against 57% and 53% of employees in non-managerial roles, while managers are somewhere in between. 

What’s even more concerning is that less than half of workers, or 46%, believe that the HR department effectively improves the workplace. 

Evidence suggests that trust in HR proportionally decreases within the organizational hierarchy and that skepticism is most common among older workers. 

The human resource department is a vital support in winning the talent war. Its primary purpose is to hire the most suitable workers and keep employees safe, healthy, and engaged in the workplace. It’s the component of every business that, hypothetically, brings everyone and everything together, ensuring cohesiveness within the firm. 

As such, HR should be one of the company’s most helpful and valuable departments. However, for most employees, that is not the case. 

By using unbiased data and expert opinions, this Shortlister article explores the predicament of this department in an attempt to uncover why we hate HR. 

Why Do People Hate HR?

It would be presumptuous to say that, for a fact, employees hate HR, but some do. 

There is a generally negative opinion about this department. However, it’s difficult to pinpoint the exact reason and use it as a statement against a business sector or an entire industry. It could be anything from job incompetence, management issues, or a disconnect between business administration and human resources. 

Ultimately, it comes down to individualistic reasons resulting from one or more bad experiences. 

From the archives of Fast Company’s magazine, an opinion piece from Keith H. Hammonds titled Why we hate HR perfectly sums up the misplaced potential of human resources in driving business performance. 

Hammonds explains how they put the organization’s interests over those of the individual. 

He references a study from 2005 by Hay Group Consultancy that demonstrates people’s displeasure with some aspects of HR and discloses the following findings: 

  • Less than half of the surveyed, or 41%, agreed that performance evaluations were fair. 
  • Even less, or 40% of employees, were optimistic about their company’s high-quality workers retention.  
  • For 42%, the job training was unfavorable, with most saying they had few advancement opportunities. 
  • Only half of the workers that weren’t on a managerial level believed that the company genuinely cared about their well-being. 

Considering how most of these ideas fall under the job requirements of an HR representative, it’s easy to see why Hammonds was so vocal about his largely unfavorable opinion of HR. 

In a way, it answers the question of why people hate HR. However, the data should be taken with reservation, seeing how things have progressed over the years. 

The generational shift pushed organizations and human resources to rethink their strategies. Employee benefits are now more than a company perk and have become necessary. Younger workers want to be happy with their jobs, are more conscious of workplace burnout, and strive for a better work-life balance. 

An Allegis Group report on recruiting and retaining Millennial and Gen Z talent reveals that 71% of HR professionals believe that outdated work practices, sketchy career paths, and limitations on advancement and development are negatively affecting employee retention.  

On a corporate level, according to SunTrust’s 2019 annual Business Pulse survey, 43% of companies increased their benefits to stay competitive in the job market and retain their talent. 

Unless they catch up on these changes soon, HR faces the risk of producing a whole new generation of workers with resentment towards their department. 

Do Employees Only Love to Hate HR Staff?

Hammonds based his pessimistic stance on a series of negative examples, but his perception doesn’t speak for all employees. 

David Reid, Sales Director at Vem Tooling, reflects on personal experience when he says that HR takes care of employees. 

“I had the privilege of working with excellent human resources professionals in my organization, who support us in various ways by overseeing things like health plans, employee assistance programs, retirement planning, and disability benefits. 

They also manage programs for ongoing education that are advantageous to both the employer and the employee, like certifications, course tuition reimbursement, or professional development. Giving workers a chance to improve their skill sets and industry knowledge improves their morale and encourages them to stay with the company.” 

So, to answer the initial question – of course not, employees don’t love to hate HR. 

It all comes down to the quality of the human resources department and how well it performs its job. Which brings us to the question – what exactly are HR’s responsibilities? 

What’s HR About?

The human resources department goes by many names. From People Operations and People Experience to Human Capital Management and even the Head of People, these terms broadly describe the department’s objective – managing people, or more specifically, the employee cycle. 

In that way, the role of a human resource specialist interconnects administrative responsibilities with employee care. 

According to David Reid: “It is HR’s duty to monitor their workers and make every effort to keep them on board. As human resources specialists, they assist employees by offering ongoing training, education, and assistance for their health and well-being. Having enough human resources is essential to keeping employees happy and motivated.” 

More specifically, the role of HR is to: 

  • Secure the best hire for the company 
  • Process payroll 
  • Manage disciplinary actions 
  • Keep track of all employee records 
  • Conduct benefit analysis and manage benefits 
  • Suggest changes and update company policies 

But also, to: 

  • Foster a productive work environment 
  • Nurture the health and well-being of the employees 
  • Provide opportunities for career advancement 
  • Enable learning opportunities and training for workers and managers 

One of the reasons people dislike this department is because they misunderstand its purpose. Therefore, workers should know when to contact a human resource specialist to avoid unnecessary antipathy. 

  • Employees should immediately notify their human resources if they experience discrimination, mobbing, or harassment from people within the firm. 
  • They should turn to the department if they have any questions or requirements regarding their benefits, taxes, health insurance, sick days, childcare leave, flexible or reduced working hours, etc. 
  • Workers can consult with human resource professionals for career growth, including pay raises, learning opportunities, or job advancement in the company.

HR vs. the Talent War

Talent is a company’s hidden asset. 

Any organization that successfully hires and retains the best talent will always be one step ahead of its competition. Its human resources department plays a considerable role in winning this talent war. 

The phrase “War for Talent” originated in 1997 and was coined by Steven Hankin of McKinsey & Company to describe the challenges of finding and hiring competent employees. Not long ago, one of the most pressing matters might’ve been obtaining skilled workers. Now, another issue ensues – attracting these workers and keeping them in the company. 

It means an efficient HR must identify quality from hundreds, if not thousands, of applications, recognizing a candidate’s potential to fit the company culture beyond their adequate job credentials. Once it does, this department is also responsible for securing the hire and, in a way, keeping the employee content to secure a longer employment cycle. 

But, as people shift their priorities, companies and their HR departments must stay on track if they want to win the war for talent. 

Research shows that: 

  • When it comes to investing in employee training, Gen Z is leading the change. 36% see it as a top factor when considering a new job, in contrast to 25% of Millennials, 20% of Gen X, and 21% of Baby Boomers. (LinkedIn) 
  • Better compensation and benefits and better career advancement opportunities are two of the top three reasons why Millennials are resigning. (LinkedIn) 
  • For more than half of employees, or 58%, choosing one job over another falls on the salary but also the company’s benefits and vacation packages. (Reflektive) 
  • 85% of employees would consider leaving a job after an unfair review. (Reflektive) 
  • Eight of ten workers would choose a job with benefits over one that offers a higher paycheck but no employee benefits. (AICPA) 
  • The most desired benefits are a 401(k)-employer match, health insurance, and paid vacation policies. (AICPA) 

Choosing one company over another solely on a greater salary no longer seems to be the case, especially for the newer generation of workers. 

With that in mind, companies and their HR departments should turn to employee-focused solutions, which, in return, will give them a competitive advantage and secure them the best and most skilled workers. 

HR Consulting Firms

Browse and compare 1000’s of vetted vendors. 

HR vs. Business Objectives

The human resources department doesn’t have an executive-level function. However, it does have matching precedence in the company since it works as a middleman between the employees and leadership.  

Therefore, HR must have an overview of the business goals and objectives and align its strategy accordingly, which is a way to keep employees in the loop and help them navigate any changes. 

There are several reasons why HR must align with the company’s objectives, including the potential to: 

  • Strengthen workers’ engagement by enabling reward programs, initiatives, and incentives. 
  • Increase the quality of work and maximize employee performance through training courses and career advancement options. 
  • Effectively facilitate administrative chores, including employment conditions or performance appraisals. 
  • Recruit top talent. 

Sometimes, the company’s objectives can collide with those of its employees. While employers try to make profits and cut costs, workers demand better salaries and more benefits. 

Ideally, HR should be able to propagate a solution that works for both parties, helping them meet in the middle and resolve the issue without significant retributions. 

The reality, however, is much different. The human resources department mainly protects the company’s interests while maintaining at least a basic level of employee satisfaction. 

Most HR representatives won’t concern themselves with solving an employee’s problem unless it directly threatens the organization. That, undoubtedly, increases the distrust between workers in non-managerial positions and paints an image of them as just courtiers of the bosses. 

When an HR organization focuses on the company’s well-being by disregarding its employees, people in the workplace turn against each other, creating a discrepancy and tension that influences everyone. 

Efficiency vs. Value

The more efficient HR is, the more value it provides for the company. 

But can we measure this? 

The intricate process of measuring HR’s value goes beyond subtracting cost from profit. It’s intangible and estimates the outcome of both human resources ROI and VOI. 

Renowned HR thought leader Dr. John Sullivan explains that human resource experts must identify their goals and develop two metrics for each, one covering the quantity of the output while the other the quality or result of the outcome. 

As first-tier metrics, Sullivan references: 

  • Workforce productivity: Calculating the ratio between money spent on employees and the company’s revenue and creating a comparison in productivity over the years. 
  • Recruitment: Estimating the turnover within the first year, the performance of new hires, the number of days a position was vacant, and the management’s satisfaction with the new employees. 
  • Retention: Measuring performance turnover in critical jobs, use post-exit surveys to determine the actual cause and whether it could’ve been prevented, and calculate diversity turnover in professional, managerial, and technical positions. 
  • Manager satisfaction: Surveying line managers to determine what they think HR functions contribute to the business goals. 

As second-tier metrics, he mentions: 

  • Compensation and benefits 
  • Employee relations 
  • Training and employee development 
  • HR goals met 

For companies that struggle with the quality of their HR, this is an excellent way to determine the pain points, as well as calculate how efficient this department is and the exact value it brings to employees and the business. 

HR’s Role in a New Hybrid & Diverse Workplace

The workplace is versatile and has seen significant transformations throughout history.  

Before the 20th century, HR didn’t even exist as a concept. It wasn’t until 1901 when John H. Patterson, leader of the National Cash Register Company, created a new role to deal with employee lockouts and strikes, which he called “personnel.” Equivalent to today’s human resources, these people were in charge of record keeping, employee compliance, workplace safety, etc. 

It means that more than a century ago, an employer realized how vital it is to have someone take care of their employees’ needs.  

Nowadays, the necessity for quality HR is paramount, particularly after the latest abrupt shift in the concept of work. Faced with lockdowns and labor shortages, companies had to adapt quickly to accommodate workers with better conditions. Otherwise, they would risk losing their leading employees to competitors that reacted swiftly to this new and diverse workplace. 

In the post-pandemic era, we now strive for environments that promote diversity and dignity at work, care for the workers’ physical and mental well-being, and allow flexibility through a four-day workweek, remote employment, or a hybrid work model. 

How well a company executes this largely depends on its HR team, which further expands its role in the current workplace. 

According to a McKinsey report, HR leaders should facilitate positive changes in these three key areas: 

  • Identity, or helping businesses find their purpose and clarify its meaning, value, and company culture. Organizations that know what they stand for can enhance their economic performance by creating long-term value and increasing employee engagement and customer trust. 
  • Agility, or helping businesses and their employees leverage speed and simplicity to improve performance and employee satisfaction. HR can help shift to a less traditional workplace by adopting new organizational models, creating a flexible workforce, and introducing next-generation performance management. 
  • Scalability, or using innovation and learning resources to reduce the skill gap. The role of the human resource department is to provide the means for transformational reskilling and upskilling of the workforce. 

Seeing how hybrid working requires new policies, digital tools, and even new skills for the organization’s HR and employees, it’s safe to say that HR is heavily invested in building a new workplace.  

Employees have unique needs, and a one-size-fits-all solution doesn’t work. Therefore, it is up to the human resource department to review the consequences of a potential workplace model shift, evaluate the economic impact, and find ways to update existing policies. That is, of course, without negatively affecting areas like recruiting, onboarding, performance, motivation, career growth opportunities, etc.  

So, their job is to maintain a strong culture while digitizing everything or hiring and retaining the best talent and trying to lower costs for the organization. 

It seems like an impossible mission. 

That only points to how important this job is and that it takes a qualified person to do it. Falling short in any area could result in failure to fulfill the requirements of the post-pandemic workforce. 

On a Final Note 

A bad company produces lousy HR.  

When an employer enforces inadequate policies, even the most qualified and ethical human resource department has little to no power over business decisions like pay raises or employee benefits. Companies also hire unqualified people for this position to save money or to work with the “henchman” who will only tend to their needs. 

Unfortunately, they don’t consider how this can only prolong the vicious cycle of incompetent HR representatives hiring unqualified workers in other company branches. 

It’s what creates a negative reputation and why people hate HR. It’s also why companies need to address the issue and create the best human resource department to recruit and retain the most qualified workers. 

Written by Shortlister Editorial Team
Written by Shortlister Editorial Team

Become a Shortlister Insider!

Get the latest news and insights on HR technology, employee benefits, and upcoming trends in the wellness world!